X’s Community Notes program, which relies on crowd-sourced fact-checking, has been criticized for not effectively addressing the spread of misinformation related to the U.S. elections on Elon Musk’s social media platform. A report published by the Center for Countering Digital Hate revealed that a significant number of misleading posts were not corrected by accurate notes within the Community Notes feature.
According to the analysis conducted by the nonprofit organization, out of a sample of 283 misleading posts, 209 did not display accurate notes to correct false or misleading claims about the U.S. elections. This accounts for 74% of the posts analyzed. Some of the misleading claims that were not addressed included false statements about the 2020 presidential election being stolen and doubts about the reliability of voting systems.
Furthermore, the report highlighted that even when Community Notes were displayed, the original misleading posts still received significantly more views compared to the accompanying corrections. The disparity in views raises concerns about the effectiveness of the fact-checking program in combating misinformation.
Community Notes allows users on X’s platform to contribute fact checks to posts after being accepted as contributors to the program. These fact checks are then rated by other users based on criteria such as accuracy, sources, clarity, and neutrality of language. The program was initially launched in 2021 under the name Birdwatch by the previous leadership of the platform, which was then known as Twitter. After Musk took over the platform in 2022, he renamed the program Community Notes.
Despite assertions from Keith Coleman, a vice president of product at X, that Community Notes maintain a high standard for effectiveness and trustworthiness, the findings of the CCDH report indicate shortcomings in addressing the spread of hate speech and disinformation on the platform. The group’s research suggests that Community Notes may not be sufficient in combating the significant challenges posed by misinformation in the digital space, particularly in the context of elections.
In response to the criticism, X highlighted external academic research that has validated the effectiveness and trustworthiness of Community Notes. However, Imran Ahmed, the CEO of CCDH, remains skeptical of the program’s impact, stating that it serves as little more than a temporary solution to a larger problem of misinformation that threatens democracy and exacerbates societal divisions.