The outcome of Moldova’s EU membership vote is still uncertain.

Moldova’s President Maia Sandu has condemned what she described as an unprecedented attack on the democratic process by foreign forces, as a referendum on EU membership in the country remains too close to call. With more than two-thirds of the votes counted, the outcome of the referendum is uncertain.

Authorities had warned of significant Russian interference in the lead-up to the polling day, highlighting efforts to combat Kremlin-backed proxies and illegal money aimed at influencing the vote. Sandu, who views the referendum as a crucial decision for Moldova’s future, also fell short of securing enough votes to win the presidential race held on the same day.

In a brief statement to the media on Sunday night, Sandu stated that her government had evidence of attempts by criminal groups to purchase votes in order to sway the outcome of the dual vote. She emphasized that these actions were supported by foreign forces hostile to Moldova’s national interests.

Despite initial results showing a majority of voters opposing EU membership, the tight margin and the potential impact of Moldova’s diaspora voters could still sway the final result. This unexpected outcome presents a challenge for Sandu, who had been a strong advocate for joining the EU.

The close referendum result is likely to deepen divisions within Moldova, particularly in rural and ethnic minority areas where opposition to the EU and Sandu is concentrated. The support for EU membership was notably low in regions like Gagauzia, where only 5% of voters were in favor.

Law enforcement had raised concerns about a Russian campaign to influence the referendum, with reports of substantial funds being used for influence operations and voter bribery. Sandu, with 38% of the vote, will now face Alexandr Stoianoglo in a runoff election next month. Stoianoglo, supported by the pro-Russian socialist party, could pose a significant challenge to Sandu’s bid for a second term.

See also  Many Californians may choose not to vote for school board due to a shortage of candidates.

Sandu’s decision to hold the referendum at this stage of the accession process was seen as a risky move by some diplomats and observers. However, her team believed it was an opportunity to solidify Moldova’s pro-EU stance, especially with support from both the president and parliament, as well as an increased backing from the EU following Russia’s actions in Ukraine.

The EU has recently pledged a multi-year financial package to support Moldova’s accession process. Sandu and her supporters had hoped for a clear mandate from the referendum, but the uncertain outcome has created a challenging political landscape in the country.