The CBS News program “60 Minutes” has a long history of interviewing every major-party candidate in Presidential elections since 1968. However, this year was different as President Trump rejected the invitation to be interviewed. Following Vice President Kamala Harris’ interview, Trump claimed that her segment had been edited to portray her more favorably. He even went as far as complaining to the FCC and demanding that CBS lose its license.
Trump often portrays himself as a victim and martyr, a tactic that resonates with his base. By playing the victim, he is able to connect with his supporters, diverting attention from his billionaire status, lavish lifestyle, and controversial military history as a draft-dodger.
While CBS typically does not respond to such complaints, they made an exception this time by addressing Trump’s allegations. They also extended an invitation to him to appear on the show at a time of his choosing, although Trump tends to prefer interviews with friendly hosts.
The Los Angeles Times reported the following:
In a rare move, the CBS news magazine “60 Minutes” refuted claims made by former President Trump regarding the editing of Vice President Kamala Harris’ recent interview to present her in a more positive light. The excerpt of Harris’ interview was first aired on “Face the Nation” before being featured in a special edition of “60 Minutes” on October 7. Trump, the Republican presidential nominee, has been adamant that CBS manipulated the interview to deceive the public and favor Harris.
However, in a statement released by the program, it was clarified that the excerpt shown on “Face the Nation” included a longer section of Harris’ answer compared to what was aired on “60 Minutes.” The question remained the same, as did Harris’ response, but different parts of her answer were highlighted. The statement emphasized that Harris’ complete answer can be found in a transcript on the CBS News website.
All in all, the controversy surrounding the editing of the interview highlights the ongoing tensions between the media and political figures, particularly during election seasons.